Estimating (Scrum): verschil tussen versies
Naar navigatie springen
Naar zoeken springen
Regel 8: | Regel 8: | ||
* '''Priority:''' Priority and therefore ''precedence'' is an important metric. Especially if stuff is on the ''critical path''. | * '''Priority:''' Priority and therefore ''precedence'' is an important metric. Especially if stuff is on the ''critical path''. | ||
− | == Fibonacci & effort == | + | == Fibonacci numbers & effort == |
Some indications when using Fibonacci numbers (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21) to express ''effort'': | Some indications when using Fibonacci numbers (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21) to express ''effort'': |
Versie van 23 apr 2024 20:45
Issue metrics
What issue metrics to use for project management?
- Effort: Preferably with a short scale. I quite like BUS or maybe fibonacci numbers
- Time estimate: maybe, within a sprint, using time estimates would be appropriate?
- Uncertainty: Keep separately track of uncertainty surrounding issues? Might be worthwhile. Example: An unclear bug that can't really be verified, unknown impact and unclear consequences
- Priority: Priority and therefore precedence is an important metric. Especially if stuff is on the critical path.
Fibonacci numbers & effort
Some indications when using Fibonacci numbers (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21) to express effort:
A two-week sprint is about 10 points.
1
You can do two 1-point issues per day
2
Takes a day.
3
About 1.5 days
5
- Takes about 2-3 days
- No need to split into smaller issues.
8
- Takes 3-5 days, or one-third to half a sprint
- Better split into smaller issues?
13
- More than a sprint
- Definitely cut into smaller issues.